Incheon Strategy goal 3: Enhance access to the physical environment, public transportation, knowledge, information and communication

Indicator 3.1 Accessible built environment

3.1.1 Accessible government buildings

The following countries and territories reported the availability of laws concerning the accessibility of government buildings:

  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of technical standards concerning the accessibility of government buildings:

  • Bhutan
  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of accessibility audit reports concerning the accessibility of government buildings:

  • Fiji
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Türkiye
Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey.

Country and territory Number of accessible government buildings in the national capital Total number of government buildings in the national capital Percentage of accessible government buildings in the national capital (%)
Hong Kong, China 1.0 1.0 100.0
Mongolia 12.0 181.0 6.6
Philippines 13.0 153.0 8.5
Republic of Korea 2,767.0 3,267.0 84.7
Singapore 1,022.0 1,035.0 98.7
Türkiye 6.0 471.0 1.3
Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey: Hong Kong, China, Chief Secretary for Administration's Office. Note: Data refer to the central government offices where a number of major government bureaux and departments are located; Mongolia, Report of Digital Network Point of Capital City, January–December 2021; Philippines, data source not specified, January–December 2014; Republic of Korea, Report of Complete Enumeration Survey on the Amenities for Persons with Disabilities 2018, May–August 2018; Singapore, Building and Construction Authority, 2022; Türkiye, Ministry of Family and Social Services and Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, January–December 2021. Note: Accessibility of buildings, structures and transportation vehicles in Türkiye is inspected by the Accessibility Monitoring and Inspection Commissions. This inspection is made upon application or ex officio. An Accessibility Certificate is given to those who meet the accessibility criteria. Data refer to those whose inspection process has been completed by the Commissions and who have been given an accessibility certificate.

3.1.2 Schools with adapted infrastructure and materials
Country and territory Percentage of schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities, by education level (%)
Primary Lower secondary Upper secondary
Afghanistan 5.0 12.2 18.5
Bangladesh 20.4 20.4 22.0
Cook Islands 100.0 100.0 100.0
Hong Kong, China 94.6 95.8 94.4
India 73.0 72.9 72.3
Kazakhstan 6.7 12.0 77.3
Macao, China 78.0 97.7 97.7
Malaysia 15.6 35.7 35.3
Maldives 100.0 100.0 100.0
Marshall Islands 21.3 - -
Myanmar 0.6 1.7 0.5
Nauru - 20.0 100.0
Niue 100.0 100.0 100.0
Palau 84.2 84.2 100.0
Philippines 7.7 17.0 13.8
Samoa 45.1 45.1 100.0
Singapore 94.1 93.3 93.3
Tonga 0.8 5.5 11.5
Turkmenistan 0.9 0.9 0.9
Tuvalu 10.0 0.0 0.0
Uzbekistan 30.4 30.5 30.0
Viet Nam 31.9 20.2 14.2
SDG indicators regional grouping Percentage of schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities, by education level (%)
Primary Lower secondary Upper secondary
Central Asia 17.1 19.3 48.2
South-Eastern Asia - 42.8 39.2
Southern Asia 61.2 66.1 63.6
Data source:

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “Statistics, SDG Indicators Database”, database. Available at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal/database (accessed on 22 April 2022): UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Afghanistan, 2019; Bangladesh, 2020; Cook Islands, 2020; Hong Kong, China, 2020; India, 2020; Kazakhstan, 2018; Macao, China, 2020; Malaysia, 2020; Maldives, 2017; Marshall Islands, 2016; Myanmar, 2018; Nauru, 2019; Niue, 2020; Palau, 2020; Philippines, 2020; Samoa, 2020; Singapore, 2019; Tonga, 2020; Turkmenistan, 2020; Tuvalu, 2020; Uzbekistan, 2020 (primary and lower secondary), 2017 (upper secondary); Viet Nam, 2020; Central Asia, 2020 (primary and lower secondary), 2019 (upper secondary); South-Eastern Asia, 2019; Southern Asia, 2020.

Indicator 3.2 Accessible public transportation

The following countries and territories reported the availability of laws concerning the accessibility of the international airports:

  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Mongolia
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of technical standards concerning the accessibility of the international airports:

  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of accessibility audit reports concerning the accessibility of the international airports:

  • Fiji
  • Pakistan
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of laws concerning the accessibility of the bus system:

  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of technical standards concerning the accessibility of the bus system:

  • China
  • Fiji
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of accessibility audit reports concerning the accessibility of the bus system:

  • Fiji
  • Republic of Korea
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of laws concerning the accessibility of the rapid transit system:

  • China
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of technical standards concerning the accessibility of the rapid transit system:

  • China
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Mongolia
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Thailand
  • Türkiye

The following countries and territories reported the availability of accessibility audit reports concerning the accessibility of the rapid transit system:

  • Mongolia
  • Republic of Korea
  • Türkiye
Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey.

Country and territory Number of accessible international airports Total number of international airports Percentage of accessible international airports (%)
Bhutan 1.0 1.0 100.0
China 61.0 61.0 100.0
Hong Kong, China 1.0 1.0 100.0
Indonesia 86.0 205.0 42.0
Lao People’s Democratic Republic 2.0 2.0 100.0
Mongolia 1.0 1.0 100.0
Republic of Korea 8.0 8.0 100.0
Singapore 2.0 2.0 100.0
Thailand 32.0 32.0 100.0
Türkiye 33.0 52.0 63.5
Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey: Bhutan, data source not specified, 2021; China, data source not specified, December 2021; Hong Kong, China, data source not specified; Indonesia, Ministry of Transportation, 2021. Note: Data refer to the number of national and international airports; Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Department of Civil Aviation, Ministry of Public Work and Transport, 2021; Mongolia, General Authority of Civil Aviation, January-December 2021; Republic of Korea, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Investigative Study on Travel Convenience of the Transportation Vulnerable, 2019–2020; Singapore, Ministry of Transport, 2020; Thailand, Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand; Türkiye, Ministry of Family and Social Services and Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, December 2020-December 2021. Note: Accessibility of buildings, structures and transportation vehicles in Türkiye is inspected by the Accessibility Monitoring and Inspection Commissions. This inspection is made upon application or ex officio. An Accessibility Certificate is given to those who meet the accessibility criteria. Data refer to those whose inspection process has been completed by the Commissions and who have been given an Accessibility Certificate.

Difficulty or inability* Number of persons with disabilities** aged 5 years and over that had difficulty or inability using public transport in Australia (in thousand)
Getting to stops or stations 378.3
Getting in or out of vehicles or carriages, due to steps 524.2
Getting in or out of vehicles or carriages, due to doors 191.6
Getting in or out of vehicles or carriages, due to other reasons 131.0
Inadequate access to toilets 57.6
Crowds or lack of space 171.6
Poor ventilation 26.9
Lack of seating or difficulty standing 262.5
Pain or discomfort when sitting or it exacerbates condition 246.5
Cognitive difficulties 188.0
Behavioural problems 109.7
Fear or anxiety 283.8
Sight problems 49.7
Age 31.4
Other health problems 33.3
Other 52.7
All who have difficulty or inability using some or all forms of public transport 1,235.2
Total with reported disability 4,123.1
Notes:

Figures have been randomly adjusted to avoid the release of confidential data. Discrepancies may occur between the sum of component items and the total.
* Figures exclude persons who do not leave home. Total is less than the sum of the components as persons may have more than one difficulty.
** Persons with disabilities include those who do not have a specific restriction or limitation.

Data source:

Australian Bureau of Statistics, “Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings”, web page. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-and-carers-australia-summary-findings/latest-release (accessed on 22 April 2022).

Indicators 3.3 and 3.4 Accessible information and communications technology

3.3(4).1 Public television news programmes, documents and websites
Country and territory Number of reported national public TV channels that broadcast news Total daily duration of reported news programmes (hrs.) Daily duration of accessibility services (hrs.) Percentage of duration of accessibility services (%)
Captioning Sign-language interpretation No accessibility services provided Captioning Sign-language interpretation No accessibility services provided
Bhutan 2.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.8 94.2
China 1.0 16.0 16.0 1.0 0.0 100.0 6.3 0.0
Fiji 3.0 3.0 1.2 2.3 0.8 38.9 75.0 25.0
Hong Kong, China 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 100.0 20.0 0.0
Philippines 1.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 16.7 83.3
Republic of Korea 4.0 28.9 28.9 7.5 0.0 100.0 25.9 0.0
Singapore 6.0 21.0 6.0 0.0 15.0 28.6 0.0 71.4
Thailand 21.0 31.5 21.0 21.0 10.5 66.7 66.7 33.3
Türkiye 4.0 45.5 24.0 0.8 20.7 52.7 1.7 45.5
Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey: Bhutan, Disabled People’s Organization of Bhutan, administrative data and Bhutan Broadcasting Service, Annual Report 2020, September 2019–December 2021. Note: Programmes on BBS1 and BBS2. ESCAP adjustments based on reported data on weekly programmes; China, data sourced from CCTV (https://www.cctv.com/), December 2021. Note: Programmes on CCTV13. Sign language interpretation services are available for at least one hour per day; Fiji, data sourced from Fiji One (https://www.fijione.tv/), FBC TV (https://www.fbctv.com.fj/) and Mai TV (https://maitvfiji.com/), 2022. Note: Programmes on Fiji One, FBC TV and Mai TV; Hong Kong, China, Commerce and Economic Development Bureau, October 2020–September 2021. Note: “Hong Kong Today” on RTHK TV31. Sign language was available in “Hong Kong Today” starting from July 2021; Philippines, MTRCB Monitoring and Inspection Unit, January 2021–January 2022. Note: Programmes on PTV4; Republic of Korea, Weekly program guides (KBS, YTN, MBC), March 2022. Note: Programmes on KBS 1, KBS 2, YTN and MBC; Singapore, Mediacorp Pte Ltd, 2021. Note: Programmes on CNA, Channel 5, Channel 8, Channel U, Suria and Vasantham; Thailand, Office of the NBTC, August 2020–2022. Note: Estimates based on programmes on 21 digital channels; Türkiye, Radio and Television Supreme Council, January–December 2021. Note: Programmes on TRT HABER (TRT NEWS: October 2019–December 2021), TRT SPOR (TRT SPORT: January 2012–January 2022), TRT ÇOCUK (TRT KIDs: March 2021–January 2022) and TRT WORLD (January 2020–January 2022).

Country and territory Constitution in accessible formats
ePub Accessible DOC/PDF Easy-read Braille
BhutanYesYesNoNo
Cambodia*----
ChinaNoYesYesYes
FijiYesYesYesYes
Hong Kong, ChinaYesYesYesNo
KyrgyzstanNoYesNoNo
Lao People’s Democratic RepublicYesYesYesNo
MongoliaNoNoNoNo
Pakistan--YesYes
Philippines-Yes--
Republic of KoreaYesYesYesYes
SingaporeNoYesNoNo
ThailandYesYes-Yes
Notes:

* Cambodia and some other countries and territories reported that the text of the Constitution is available on accessible government websites.

Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey.

Country and territory National government website with accessibility features
Adjustable font Adjustable line space Adjustable contrast scheme Read-out function Keyboard accessibility Graphical elements with alternative text Videos in sign language
Bhutan---No---
CambodiaYes----Yes-
ChinaYesYesYesYesYesNoNo
FijiNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Hong Kong, China*YesYesNoNoYesYesNo
KyrgyzstanYesYesNoNoNo--
Lao People’s Democratic RepublicNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
MongoliaYesNoNoYesNoNoNo
Pakistan**YesYesYes----
Republic of KoreaYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
ThailandYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Notes:

* The website (www.gov.hk) basically conforms to WCAG 2.0 Level AA standard.
** Other accessibility features are available. For example, the animation can be paused and the website is user-friendly to persons with dyslexia.

Data source:

Responses to the ESCAP government survey.

3.3(4).2 Use of information and communications technology
Country Percentage of women aged 18–49 years who used ICT (%)
Used a computer at least once a week during the last 3 months Own a mobile phone Used a mobile phone at least once a week during the last 3 months Used Internet at least once a week during the last 3 months
Women with functional difficulties Women without functional difficulties Women with functional difficulties Women without functional difficulties Women with functional difficulties Women without functional difficulties Women with functional difficulties Women without functional difficulties
Bangladesh 0.5 1.3 62.8 76.2 86.2 93.3 5.6 11.6
Kiribati 13.6 21.2 45.5 55.3 36.3 43.1 30.1 37.5
Kyrgyzstan 9.4 20.1 87.9 94.3 87.3 93.3 56.2 73.8
Mongolia 12.2 31.7 94.2 97.6 90.7 95.6 42.7 70.0
Nepal 0.5 4.9 70.2 83.3 71.0 85.6 26.9 35.6
Samoa 16.6 16.8 65.7 85.1 69.9 80.4 40.4 48.8
Tonga 20.0 37.4 89.7 92.1 88.3 90.2 64.0 72.7
Turkmenistan 0.0 13.8 63.0 92.9 75.3 95.5 15.5 47.1
Country Percentage of men aged 18–49 years who used ICT (%)
Used a computer at least once a week during the last 3 months Own a mobile phone Used a mobile phone at least once a week during the last 3 months Used Internet at least once a week during the last 3 months
Men with functional difficulties Men without functional difficulties Men with functional difficulties Men without functional difficulties Men with functional difficulties Men without functional difficulties Men with functional difficulties Men without functional difficulties
Kiribati 14.8 29.3 34.9 55.2 26.1 38.8 15.6 35.5
Mongolia 14.1 30.6 93.5 96.4 91.0 92.7 36.1 59.0
Nepal 9.2 13.1 61.3 95.9 65.8 96.6 20.9 56.7
Tonga 26.6* 25.2 90.8* 93.2 78.0* 91.3 66.4* 81.2
Notes:

* The figure is based on 25–49 unweighted cases and should be interpreted with caution.

Data source:

UNICEF, “Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys”, database. Available at: https://mics.unicef.org/ (accessed on 2 May 2022): Bangladesh, 2019; Kiribati, 2018-19; Kyrgyzstan, 2018; Mongolia, 2018; Nepal, 2019; Samoa, 2019-2020; Tonga, 2019; Turkmenistan, 2019.

3.3(4).3 Information and communications technology skills
Country Percentage of women aged 18–49 years who performed at least one of the nine listed computer related activities* in the last 3 months (%) Percentage of men aged 18–49 years who performed at least one of the nine listed computer related activities in the last 3 months (%)
Women with functional difficulties Women without functional difficulties Men with functional difficulties Men without functional difficulties
Bangladesh 0.6 1.3 - -
Kiribati 13.0 24.4 12.7 31.5
Kyrgyzstan 9.4 20.0 - -
Mongolia 12.3 32.3 12.7 29.6
Nepal 0.3 5.5 9.2 15.0
Samoa 17.6 17.4 - -
Tonga 20.0 38.9 16.3** 26.0
Turkmenistan 0.6 15.3 - -
Notes:

* Activities include: 1) copied or moved a file or folder; 2) used a copy and paste tool to duplicate or move information within a document; 3) sent e-mail with attached file, such as a document, picture or video; 4) used a basic arithmetic formula in a spreadsheet; 5) connected and installed a new device, such as a modem, camera or printer; 6) found, downloaded, installed and configured software; 7) created an electronic presentation with presentation software, including text, images, sound, video or charts; 8) transferred a file between a computer and other device; and 9) wrote a computer program in any programming language.
** The figure is based on 25–49 unweighted cases and should be interpreted with caution.

Data source:

UNICEF, “Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys”, database. Available at: https://mics.unicef.org/ (accessed on 2 May 2022): Bangladesh, 2019; Kiribati, 2018-19; Kyrgyzstan, 2018; Mongolia, 2018; Nepal, 2019; Samoa, 2019-2020; Tonga, 2019; Turkmenistan, 2019.

3.3(4).4 Ratification of and accession to the Marrakesh Treaty
Country and territory Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled
Signature Ratification/accession In force
Afghanistan 13-Jun-2028 18-Jul-2026 18-Oct-2026
Armenia - 22-Jun-2001 22-Sep-2001
Australia 14-Jun-2023 15-Dec-2010 16-Sep-2030
Azerbaijan - 18-Sep-2024 18-Dec-2024
Cambodia 13-Jun-2028 - -
China 13-Jun-2028 22-Feb-2005 22-May-2005
Cook Islands - 19-Mar-2019 19-Jun-2019
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 13-Jun-2028 16-Feb-2019 16-Sep-2030
India 14-Apr-2030 14-Jun-2024 16-Sep-2030
Indonesia 13-Sep-2024 20-Jan-2028 20-Apr-2028
Iran (Islamic Republic of) 14-Jun-2027 - -
Japan - 18-Oct-2001 19-Jan-2001
Kiribati - 19-Jul-2031 19-Oct-2031
Kyrgyzstan - 17-May-2015 17-Aug-2015
Malaysia - 22-Mar-2031 22-Jun-2030
Marshall Islands - 19-Feb-2008 19-May-2008
Mongolia 13-Jun-2028 15-Sep-2023 16-Sep-2030
Nepal 13-Jun-2028 - -
New Zealand - 19-Oct-2004 20-Jan-2004
Philippines - 18-Dec-2018 19-Mar-2018
Republic of Korea 14-Jun-2026 15-Oct-2008 16-Sep-2030
Russian Federation - 18-Feb-2008 18-May-2008
Singapore - 15-Mar-2030 16-Sep-2030
Sri Lanka - 16-Oct-2005 17-Jan-2005
Tajikistan - 19-Feb-2027 19-May-2027
Thailand - 19-Jan-2028 19-Apr-2028
Türkiye 13-Nov-2001 - -
Turkmenistan - 20-Oct-2015 21-Jan-2015
Uzbekistan - 22-Mar-2007 22-Jun-2007
Vanuatu - 20-May-2006 20-Aug-2006
Data source:

WIPO, “WIPO-administrated treaties, contracting parties, Marrakesh VIP Treaty”, web page. Available at https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/treaties/ShowResults?start_year=ANY&end_year=ANY&search_what=C&code=ALL&treaty_id=843 (accessed on 24 August 2022).

3.3(4).5 Digital Accessibility Rights Evaluation Index
Country and territory DARE Index - laws and regulations
Marrakesh Treaty ratification/ accession (2.5 points) CRPD ratification (UN Treaty) (2.5 points) General law protecting the rights of persons with disabilities (5 points) Definition of ICT accessibility (5 points) Definition of reasonable accommodation (5 points) Universal service obligation includes persons with disabilities (5 points)
Afghanistan 2.5 2.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Armenia 0* 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Australia 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Azerbaijan 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Bangladesh 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Bhutan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Cambodia 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
China 0* 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Cook Islands 2.5 2.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Fiji 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Georgia 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
India 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Indonesia 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0
Japan 2.5 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kazakhstan 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Kyrgyzstan 2.5 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lao People’s Democratic Republic 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Malaysia 0* 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Maldives 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Micronesia (Federated States of) -** 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mongolia 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Myanmar 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Nepal 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
New Zealand 2.5 2.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pakistan 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Palau -** 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Papua New Guinea 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Philippines 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Russian Federation 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Samoa 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Singapore 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sri Lanka 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Tajikistan 2.5 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0
Thailand 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Türkiye 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0
Turkmenistan 0* 2.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Tuvalu 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uzbekistan 0* 0*** 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Viet Nam -** 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Notes:

Points were calculated as 0 (item is not present in the country or territory) and 2.5/5 (item is present in the country or territory).
* Countries had ratified or acceded to the Marrakesh Treaty as of 31 July 2022.
** In 2018, the index did not report on the ratification of or accession to the Marrakesh Treaty. A country or territory achieved 5 points if it had ratified CRPD.
*** Countries had ratified or acceded to CRPD as of 31 July 2022.

Country and territory DARE Index – capacity to implement
Government agency for persons with disabilities (5 points) Government agency for accessible ICTs (5 points) Process to involve OPDs in ICT accessibility policy making (5 points) Country refers to international ICT accessibility standards (5 points) ICT accessibility courses available at universities (5 points)
Afghanistan 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Armenia 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Australia 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Azerbaijan 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bangladesh 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bhutan 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cambodia 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
China 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Cook Islands 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
Fiji 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Georgia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
India 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Indonesia 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
Japan 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kazakhstan 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kyrgyzstan 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lao People’s Democratic Republic 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Malaysia 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Maldives 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Micronesia (Federated States of) 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mongolia 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Myanmar 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
Nepal 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
New Zealand 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
Pakistan 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Palau 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Papua New Guinea 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Philippines 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Russian Federation 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Samoa 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Singapore 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Sri Lanka 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
Tajikistan 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Thailand 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Türkiye 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
Turkmenistan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tuvalu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uzbekistan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
Viet Nam 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 0.0
Notes:

Points were calculated as 0 (item is not present in the country or territory) and 5 (item is present in the country or territory).

Country and territory DARE Index - policy and programme outcomes by areas of ICT accessibility and level of implementation
Web (5 points) TV and multimedia (5 points) Mobile telephone (5 points) E-books and digital contents (5 points) Internet availability and usage among persons with disabilities (5 points) Inclusive ICTs for all in education (5 points) Enabling ICTs for all in employment (5 points) E-government and smart cities for all (5 points) Enabling assistive technologies and ICTs for independent living (5 points) Procurement of accessible public goods and services for all citizens (5 points)
Afghanistan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Armenia 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Australia 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Azerbaijan 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Bangladesh 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bhutan 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0
Cambodia 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
China 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0
Cook Islands 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fiji 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Georgia 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.0
India 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0
Indonesia 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Japan 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0
Kazakhstan 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0
Kyrgyzstan 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0
Lao People’s Democratic Republic 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Malaysia 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0
Maldives 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0
Micronesia (Federated States of) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mongolia 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0
Myanmar 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Nepal 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
New Zealand 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pakistan 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0
Palau 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Papua New Guinea 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Philippines 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0
Russian Federation 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
Samoa 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Singapore 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
Sri Lanka 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tajikistan 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Thailand 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Türkiye 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Turkmenistan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
Tuvalu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uzbekistan 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Viet Nam 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Notes:

Points were calculated on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 represents no policy or programme, 1 represents no implementation of policy or programme, 2 represents implementation at a minimum level, 3 represents implementation at a partial level, 4 represents implementation at a substantial level and 5 represents full implementation.

Country and territory DARE Index – total scores
Laws and regulations (25 points) Country capacity to implement (25 points) Policy and programme outcomes by areas of ICT accessibility and level of implementation (50 points) Total (100 points)
Afghanistan 15.0 5.0 3.0 23.0
Armenia 7.5 5.0 1.0 13.5
Australia 25.0 25.0 30.0 80.0
Azerbaijan 25.0 5.0 19.0 49.0
Bangladesh 12.5 5.0 5.0 22.5
Bhutan 5.0 10.0 11.0 26.0
Cambodia 7.5 10.0 9.0 26.5
China 22.5 15.0 12.0 49.5
Cook Islands 15.0 10.0 0.0 25.0
Fiji 17.5 5.0 19.0 41.5
Georgia 7.5 0.0 18.0 25.5
India 20.0 15.0 13.0 48.0
Indonesia 20.0 20.0 8.0 48.0
Japan 10.0 10.0 16.0 36.0
Kazakhstan 12.5 5.0 26.0 43.5
Kyrgyzstan 10.0 5.0 8.0 23.0
Lao People’s Democratic Republic 7.5 10.0 1.0 18.5
Malaysia 22.5 10.0 14.0 46.5
Maldives 7.5 5.0 3.0 15.5
Micronesia (Federated States of) 10.0 5.0 0.0 15.0
Mongolia 20.0 10.0 12.0 42.0
Myanmar 17.5 10.0 15.0 42.5
Nepal 17.5 10.0 10.0 37.5
New Zealand 10.0 15.0 8.0 33.0
Pakistan 22.5 10.0 14.0 46.5
Palau 15.0 5.0 3.0 23.0
Papua New Guinea 2.5 5.0 2.0 9.5
Philippines 20.0 15.0 18.0 53.0
Russian Federation 20.0 15.0 26.0 61.0
Samoa 12.5 10.0 4.0 26.5
Singapore 5.0 15.0 13.0 33.0
Sri Lanka 20.0 10.0 7.0 37.0
Tajikistan 17.5 15.0 20.0 52.5
Thailand 20.0 5.0 6.0 31.0
Türkiye 17.5 15.0 15.0 47.5
Turkmenistan 12.5 0.0 3.0 15.5
Tuvalu 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.5
Uzbekistan 10.0 5.0 7.0 22.0
Viet Nam 25.0 15.0 15.0 55.0
Notes:

For detailed methodology, please see G3ict, “Methodology”, web page. Available at https://g3ict.org/digital-accessibility-rights-evaluation-index/methodology (accessed on 18 April 2022).

Data source:

G3ict, “Country dashboard”, web page. Available at https://g3ict.org/country-profile (accessed on 18 April 2022): All data refer to the year 2020, except for Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau and Viet Nam (2018).

Indicator 3.5 Assistive technology

Country Defined standards for assistive technology provision Agreed list of essential assistive technology Government is largest financial contributor to assistive technology services Appropriate assistive technologies are available and affordable
Australia Yes Yes Yes Expanding
Brunei Darussalam No No Yes Emerging
Cambodia Yes No No Emerging
China Yes Yes Yes Expanding
Fiji No No Yes Emerging
Japan Yes No Yes Expanding
Kiribati No No Yes Emerging
Lao People’s Democratic Republic No No No Emerging
Malaysia No No Yes Established
Marshall Islands Yes No No Emerging
Micronesia (Federated States of) No No No Emerging
Mongolia Yes Yes Yes Established
New Zealand Yes Yes Yes Expanding
Palau No No Yes Emerging
Papua New Guinea No Yes Yes Established
Philippines Yes No No Emerging
Republic of Korea Yes No Yes Expanding
Samoa No No No Established
Singapore Yes No Yes Expanding
Solomon Islands No No Yes Established
Tonga No No No Emerging
Tuvalu No No Yes Emerging
Vanuatu No No No Emerging
Viet Nam Yes Yes Yes Established
Product type Number of Governments providing assistive technology (24 reporting Governments)
Ambulatory devices 23.0
Wheelchairs 21.0
Glasses 20.0
Orthotic devices 20.0
Prosthetic devices 19.0
Hearing aids 18.0
White canes 17.0
Low vision devices 15.0
Supported seating 15.0
Braille conversion 10.0
Communication aids 10.0
Adapted cycles/scooters/cars 7.0
Data source: