Indicator 3.5

Table A12
Access status to assistive devices, by persons with disabilities and by

Country or area Number of persons with
disabilities who have access
to assistive devices
Number of persons with
disabilities who need any assistive device
but do not have access to them all
Proportion of persons with
disabilities who have access
to assistive devices (percentage)
Male Female Both Male Female Both Male Female Both
Armenia 5,278 4,589 9,867 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Bhutan 48 42 1,088 698 330 1,028 6.4 11.3 51.4
Cambodia 22,773 7,476 30,249 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Georgia 2,100 1,537 3,637 1,078 789 1,867 66.1 66.1 66.1
Hong Kong, China 95 82 177 18 26 44 84.1 75.9 80.1
India 259,432 106,021 365,502 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Indonesia 539,232 517,234 1,056,467 2,371,956 2,580,219 4,952,175 18.5 16.7 17.6
Republic of Korea 371,090 290,503 661,593 346,357 372,881 719,238 51.7 43.8 47.9
Malaysia ... ... 9,598 ... ... 889 ... ... 91.5
Mongolia (2013) ... ... 12,459 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Mongolia (2014) ... ... 17,800 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Mongolia (2015) ... ... 17,641 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Russian Federation 4,552,346 6,034,505 10,586,851 704,405 933,746 1,638,151 86.6 86.6 86.6
Samoa 405 383 788 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Thailand 187,289 236,251 423,541 106,056 128,202 234,257 63.8 64.8 64.4
Timor-Leste 1,124 853 1,977 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Vanuatu 104 70 174 225 131 356 31.6 34.8 32.8

Download CSV File

 

Explanatory notes on data sources and collection methods (as reported by governments)

Armenia (by Agency of Medical and Social Expertise under the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs; types of disability covered: mobility, hearing, visual and speech); Bhutan (by Ministry of Health and hospitals, 2016; counted mobility and hearing, by sex); Georgia (administrative records of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs and Social Service Agency); India (source and method unspecified); Indonesia (Susenas, 2012 Module Social Cultural and Education, by BPS); Malaysia (source and method unspecified; some do not get assistive devices for following reasons: (i) they are not eligible because their income is above the poverty line, (ii) some applicants could not be traced due to wrong address given in the form, (iii) some applicants were referred to other agencies); Mongolia (annual data for 2013, 2014 and 2015; sum of the number of persons using any assistive device; Report of General Office for Labor and Social Welfare Services, 2016); Republic of Korea (2014 National Survey on Persons with Disabilities; Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs); Russian Federation (data refer to provision of technical means of rehabilitation to persons with disabilities and veterans with prosthetic devices, Ministry of Labour, Agency of Social Insurance); Samoa (from WS SIMDES 2016_Q3 Report 2016; National Health Service); Singapore (data were not provided; data collection is ongoing by SG Enable on the Assistive Technology Fund measures to help persons with disabilities get assistive devices at discounted rates); Thailand (Disability Survey, 2012, and administrative records provided by Ministry of Digital Economy and Society, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities; Social Security Office and Ministry of Public Health in 2016–2017); Timor-Leste (source and method unspecified; disaggregated by types of disability: mobility, speech and multiple); Vanuatu (source and method unspecified).

» Go back to Data